Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5055460
DOI10.1080/00031305.2020.1816214OpenAlexW2994409524MaRDI QIDQ5055460
Publication date: 14 December 2022
Published in: The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2020.1816214
directional errorreproducibility crisissign errorcalibrated \(p\)-valuecalibrated effect size estimation
Related Items (4)
Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate ⋮ Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors ⋮ Coherent checking and updating of Bayesian models without specifying the model space: a decision-theoretic semantics for possibility theory ⋮ Interval estimation, point estimation, and null hypothesis significance testing calibrated by an estimated posterior probability of the null hypothesis
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Rejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
- Empirical Bayes interval estimates that are conditionally equal to unadjusted confidence intervals or to default prior credibility intervals
- Theoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) value
- Prediction with confidence -- a general framework for predictive inference
- Confidence distributions: a review
- Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression
- Simple estimators of false discovery rates given as few as one or two \(p\)-values without strong parametric assumptions
- Estimating the Null Distribution to Adjust Observed Confidence Levels for Genome-Scale Screening
- Coherent Frequentism: A Decision Theory Based on Confidence Sets
- A note on p-values interpreted as plausibilities
- Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
- Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment
- Confidence Distribution, the Frequentist Distribution Estimator of a Parameter: A Review
- Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
- Reconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided Tests
- Confidence distributions and empirical Bayes posterior distributions unified as distributions of evidential support
- Correcting false discovery rates for their bias toward false positives
- Calibration ofρValues for Testing Precise Null Hypotheses
- Control of Directional Errors in Fixed Sequence Multiple Testing
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values
- The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
- Abandon Statistical Significance
- Interval estimation, point estimation, and null hypothesis significance testing calibrated by an estimated posterior probability of the null hypothesis
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- How the Maximal Evidence of P-Values Against Point Null Hypotheses Depends on Sample Size
This page was built for publication: Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum
