Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate

DOI10.1080/00031305.2021.1999857MaRDI QIDQ5050813zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Joshua D. Habiger, Ye Liang

Publication date 18 November 2022

Published in The American Statistician (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2021.1999857

zbMATH Keywords

\(p\)-valuefalse discovery ratefalse positivelocal false discovery ratereplicable researchstatistical significance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites work

• A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use
• Abandon Statistical Significance
• Adaptive false discovery rate control for heterogeneous data
• Before p < 0.05 to Beyond p < 0.05: Using History to Contextualize p-Values and Significance Testing
• Calibration of values for testing precise null hypotheses
• Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires
• Covariate-assisted ranking and screening for large-scale two-sample inference
• Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment
• Finite mixture models
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48701 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 720689 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3068128 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication
• Large-scale inference. Empirical Bayes methods for estimation, testing, and prediction
• Large-Scale Replication Projects in Contemporary Psychological Research
• Microarrays, empirical Bayes and the two-groups model
• Modelling publication bias and p-hacking
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
• Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
• Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Interpreted and Calibrated by Estimating Probabilities of Sign Errors: A Bayes-Frequentist Continuum
• Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
• Oracle and Adaptive Compound Decision Rules for False Discovery Rate Control
• Reconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided Tests
• Revised standards for statistical evidence
• Simultaneous Testing of Grouped Hypotheses: Finding Needles in Multiple Haystacks
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• The p-Value Requires Context, Not a Threshold
• The ASA President's task force statement on statistical significance and replicability
• The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
• The Detection of Nonnegligible Directional Effects With Associated Measures of Statistical Significance
• The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
• The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the \(q\)-value
• The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication
• Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors
• What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?
• Why should clinicians care about Bayesian methods? (With discussions and response)
• Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the Contrary

Cited in

(2)

• Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors
• Bayesian and frequentist inference derived from the maximum entropy principle with applications to propagating uncertainty about statistical methods

This page was built for publication: Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5050813)