Revised standards for statistical evidence

DOI10.1073/pnas.1313476110zbMath1357.62025OpenAlexW1970588407WikidataQ37353057 ScholiaQ37353057MaRDI QIDQ2973737

Valen E. Johnson

Publication date: 5 April 2017

Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1313476110

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10) Minimax procedures in statistical decision theory (62C20) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Related Items (35)

How the Maximal Evidence of P-Values Against Point Null Hypotheses Depends on Sample Size ⋮ Bayesian t-tests for correlations and partial correlations ⋮ Editors' introduction to the special issue ``Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: practical relevance and new developments ⋮ Harold Jeffreys's default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: explanation, extension, and application in psychology ⋮ The expected demise of the Bayes factor ⋮ Rejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses ⋮ Publication Policies for Replicable Research and the Community-Wide False Discovery Rate ⋮ Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking ⋮ Reconnecting p-Value and Posterior Probability Under One- and Two-Sided Tests ⋮ Adjusting Published Estimates for Exploratory Biases Using the Truncated Normal Distribution ⋮ Objective Bayesian comparison of constrained analysis of variance models ⋮ Likelihood, Replicability and Robbins' Confidence Sequences ⋮ Making decisions with evidential probability and objective Bayesian calibration inductive logics ⋮ Bayesian Calibration of p‐Values from Fisher's Exact Test ⋮ Prior‐free Bayes Factors Based on Data Splitting ⋮ Revised evidence for statistical standards ⋮ Adaptive revised standards for statistical evidence ⋮ Reply to Gelman, Gaudart, Pericchi: More reasons to revise standards for statistical evidence ⋮ A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing ⋮ A modified sequential probability ratio test ⋮ On the existence of uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests with application to non-central chi-squared tests ⋮ Comment on article by Rubio and Steel ⋮ How redefining statistical significance can worsen the replication crisis ⋮ A Powerful Bayesian Test for Equality of Means in High Dimensions ⋮ Reconceptualizing the p -value from a likelihood ratio test: a probabilistic pairwise comparison of models based on Kullback-Leibler discrepancy measures ⋮ Comparing Objective and Subjective Bayes Factors for the Two-Sample Comparison: The Classification Theorem in Action ⋮ Evidence From Marginally Significant t Statistics ⋮ p-Values, Bayes Factors, and Sufficiency ⋮ An Introduction to Second-Generation p-Values ⋮ Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values ⋮ The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values ⋮ Abandon Statistical Significance ⋮ How Large Are Your G-Values? Try Gosset’s Guinnessometrics When a Little “p” Is Not Enough ⋮ The World of Research Has Gone Berserk: Modeling the Consequences of Requiring “Greater Statistical Stringency” for Scientific Publication ⋮ Beyond Calculations: A Course in Statistical Thinking

Cites Work

• Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis
• Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias

This page was built for publication: Revised standards for statistical evidence