A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing

DOI10.1111/bmsp.12132zbMath1409.62241OpenAlexW2792341222WikidataQ88143860 ScholiaQ88143860MaRDI QIDQ4627511

Jiannan Lu, Alex Deng, Yixuan Qiu

Publication date: 11 March 2019

Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://psyarxiv.com/n53zs/

zbMATH Keywords

monotonicityhypothesis testing\(p\)-valuereplicationstatistical significancepower calculationreproducibilitypsychological sciencedesign calculationS/M errors

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Related Items

Adjusting Published Estimates for Exploratory Biases Using the Truncated Normal Distribution ⋮ retrodesign

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Rejection odds and rejection ratios: a proposal for statistical practice in testing hypotheses
• Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests
• Type S error for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures
• Unified frequentist and Bayesian testing of a precise hypothesis. With comments by Dennis V. Lindley, Thomas A. Louis and David Hinkley and a rejoinder by the authors
• Beautiful parents have more daughters: a further implication of the generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH)
• Statistical learning and selective inference
• Revised standards for statistical evidence
• Bayes Factors
• A 250-year argument: Belief, behavior, and the bootstrap
• Testing Statistical Hypotheses