Type S error for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures

DOI10.1007/s001800000040zbMath1037.62015OpenAlexW2083599439MaRDI QIDQ1424597

Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman

Publication date: 16 March 2004

Published in: Computational Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001800000040

zbMATH Keywords

errorshierarchical modelBayesian inferencemultiple comparisonscomparison procedure

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Bayesian inference (62F15) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Related Items

Temporal Variabilities Provide Additional Category-Related Information in Object Category Decoding: A Systematic Comparison of Informative EEG Features, Statistical evidence and sample size determination for Bayesian hypothesis testing, A loss function related to the FDR for random effects multiple comparisons, A Proposal for Informative Default Priors Scaled by the Standard Error of Estimates, Shrunken p‐Values for Assessing Differential Expression with Applications to Genomic Data Analysis, On the Effects of Spatial Confounding in Hierarchical Models, A power analysis for Model-X knockoffs with \(\ell_p\)-regularized statistics, Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification, Bayesian statistics then and now, Adaptive procedures for directional false discovery rate control, A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing, Statistical methods for replicability assessment, Undesirable optimality results in multiple testing?, retrodesign, Alleviating spatial confounding for areal data problems by displacing the geographical centroids, Adaptive sign error control, A knockoff filter for high-dimensional selective inference

Cites Work

• Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
• Posterior predictive \(p\)-values
• Conclusions vs Decisions
• Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
• Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
• Asymptotic Distribution of P Values in Composite Null Models
• Parametric Empirical Bayes Inference: Theory and Applications
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item