Objective Bayesian comparison of constrained analysis of variance models

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1682437

DOI10.1007/S11336-016-9516-YzbMATH Open1402.62040arXiv1405.4801OpenAlexW1651663237WikidataQ39322044 ScholiaQ39322044MaRDI QIDQ1682437FDOQ1682437


Authors: Guido Consonni, R. Paroli Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 November 2017

Published in: Psychometrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the social sciences we are often interested in comparing models specified by parametric equality or inequality constraints. For instance, when examining three group means mu1,mu2,mu3 through an analysis of variance (ANOVA), a model may specify that mu1<mu2<mu3, while another one may state that mu1=mu3<mu2, and finally a third model may instead suggest that all means are unrestricted. This is a challenging problem, because it involves a combination of non-nested models, as well as nested models having the same dimension. We adopt an objective Bayesian approach, and derive the posterior probability of each model under consideration. Our method is based on the intrinsic prior methodology, with suitably modifications to accommodate equality and inequality constraints. Focussing on normal ANOVA models, a comparative assessment is carried out through simulation studies, showing that correct model identification is possible even in situations where frequentist power is low. We also present an application to real data collected in a psychological experiment.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4801




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Objective Bayesian comparison of constrained analysis of variance models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1682437)