Compatibility of prior specifications across linear models

From MaRDI portal
Publication:908147

DOI10.1214/08-STS258zbMATH Open1329.62331arXiv1102.2981MaRDI QIDQ908147FDOQ908147


Authors: Guido Consonni, Piero Veronese Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 3 February 2016

Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Bayesian model comparison requires the specification of a prior distribution on the parameter space of each candidate model. In this connection two concerns arise: on the one hand the elicitation task rapidly becomes prohibitive as the number of models increases; on the other hand numerous prior specifications can only exacerbate the well-known sensitivity to prior assignments, thus producing less dependable conclusions. Within the subjective framework, both difficulties can be counteracted by linking priors across models in order to achieve simplification and compatibility; we discuss links with related objective approaches. Given an encompassing, or full, model together with a prior on its parameter space, we review and summarize a few procedures for deriving priors under a submodel, namely marginalization, conditioning, and Kullback--Leibler projection. These techniques are illustrated and discussed with reference to variable selection in linear models adopting a conventional g-prior; comparisons with existing standard approaches are provided. Finally, the relative merits of each procedure are evaluated through simulated and real data sets.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2981




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (33)





This page was built for publication: Compatibility of prior specifications across linear models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q908147)