Comparative Probability Metrics: Using Posterior Probabilities to Account for Practical Equivalence in A/B tests
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5050831
Cites work
- p-Values, Bayes Factors, and Sufficiency
- A Proposed Hybrid Effect Size Plus p-Value Criterion: Empirical Evidence Supporting its Use
- Abandon Statistical Significance
- An Introduction to Second-Generation p-Values
- Bayes Factors
- Blending Bayesian and Classical Tools to Define Optimal Sample-Size-Dependent Significance Levels
- Coup de Grâce for a Tough Old Bull: “Statistically Significant” Expires
- How Large Are Your G-Values? Try Gosset’s Guinnessometrics When a Little “p” Is Not Enough
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- Moving Towards the Post p < 0.05 Era via the Analysis of Credibility
- Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence and Noninferiority
- The p-Value Requires Context, Not a Threshold
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
- Three Recommendations for Improving the Use of p-Values
- ValidP-Values Behave Exactly as They Should: Some Misleading Criticisms ofP-Values and Their Resolution WithS-Values
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Comparative Probability Metrics: Using Posterior Probabilities to Account for Practical Equivalence in A/B tests
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5050831)