A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”

DOI10.1002/BIMJ.201700001zbMATH Open1391.62254OpenAlexW2616408024WikidataQ30234457 ScholiaQ30234457MaRDI QIDQ5364013FDOQ5364013

Authors: Stefan Wellek 

Publication date: 2 October 2017

Published in: Biometrical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700001

Recommendations

• Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy”'
• Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
• Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy”'
• Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
• Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
• Contribution to the discussion of ``A critical evaluation of the current \(p\)-value controversy
• Contribution to the discussion of the paper by Stefan Wellek: “A critical evaluation of the current p‐value controversy”
• Are p‐values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of ‘A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy” ’
• Author response to the contributors to the discussion on ``A critical evaluation of the current `\(p\)-value controversy'

zbMATH Keywords

predictionBayesian inferencedata mininghypotheses testingmeasures of evidencemultiplicity correctionreproducibility crisis\(p\)-value controversyreproducibility of experiments

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01)

Cited In (14)

• Contribution to the discussion of ``A critical evaluation of the current \(p\)-value controversy
• A note on tests for relevant differences with extremely large sample sizes
• A selective survey of selective inference
• Time to dispense with the \(p\)-value in OR? Rationale and implications of the statement of the American Statistical Association (ASA) on \(p\)-values
• Some robust approaches based on copula for monitoring bivariate processes and component-wise assessment
• Theoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) value
• Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating \(p\)-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: a frequentist semantics for possibility theory
• The role of the \(p\)-value in the multitesting problem
• Testing practical relevance of treatment effects
• Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
• Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
• The use of \(p\)-values in applied research: interpretation and new trends
• Are p‐values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of ‘A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy” ’
• Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors

This page was built for publication: A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5364013)