A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5364013
Recommendations
- Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy”'
- Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
- Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy”'
- Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
- Contribution to the discussion of “A critical evaluation of the current ‘p‐value controversy’”
- Contribution to the discussion of ``A critical evaluation of the current \(p\)-value controversy
- Contribution to the discussion of the paper by Stefan Wellek: “A critical evaluation of the current p‐value controversy”
- Are p‐values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of ‘A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy” ’
- Author response to the contributors to the discussion on ``A critical evaluation of the current `\(p\)-value controversy'
Cited in
(14)- Theoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) value
- Time to dispense with the \(p\)-value in OR? Rationale and implications of the statement of the American Statistical Association (ASA) on \(p\)-values
- Some robust approaches based on copula for monitoring bivariate processes and component-wise assessment
- A note on tests for relevant differences with extremely large sample sizes
- The use of p-values in applied research: interpretation and new trends
- The role of the \(p\)-value in the multitesting problem
- Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Defended and Calibrated by Bayesian Model Checking
- A selective survey of selective inference
- Are p‐values under attack? Contribution to the discussion of ‘A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy” ’
- Contribution to the discussion of ``A critical evaluation of the current \(p\)-value controversy
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- Fisher's disjunction as the principle vindicating \(p\)-values, confidence intervals, and their generalizations: a frequentist semantics for possibility theory
- Fiducialize statistical significance: transformingp-values into conservative posterior probabilities and Bayes factors
- Testing practical relevance of treatment effects
This page was built for publication: A critical evaluation of the current “p‐value controversy”
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5364013)
