On the solution existence of nonconvex quadratic programming problems in Hilbert spaces (Q1696189)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 17:25, 25 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the solution existence of nonconvex quadratic programming problems in Hilbert spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    On the solution existence of nonconvex quadratic programming problems in Hilbert spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 February 2018
    0 references
    The aim of this paper is to provide existence results for the following problem (QP): \[ \begin{cases} \min f(x):=\frac{1}{2}\langle x,Tx\rangle +\langle c,x\rangle\\ \mathrm{s.t.}\;x\in {F}, {\mathrm{where}}\; F:=\{x\in {\mathcal{H}}:\; g_i(x):=\frac{1}{2}\langle x,T_i x\rangle +\langle c_i,x\rangle+\alpha_i\leq 0,\; i=1,,2,\dots, m\}, \end{cases} \] where \(\mathcal{H}\) is a Hilbert space, \(T:\mathcal{H}\to \mathcal{H}\) is a continuous self-adjoint operator, \(T_i\) is a positive semidefinite continuous linear self-adjoint operator on \(\mathcal{H},\) \(c,c_i\in \mathcal{H},\) and \(\alpha, \alpha_i\) are real numbers, \(i=1,2,\dots, m.\) Despite the feasible set is always convex, the problem (QP) is not, in general, a convex problem. The main results of the paper are the content of Theorem 2 and Theorem 5; both provide a sufficient condition for the existence of an optimal solution on a nonempty set \(F\). The assumptions of Theorem 2 are the following: \(f\) is bounded from below over \(F,\) \((v\in 0^+F,\langle v,Tv\rangle=0)\Rightarrow \langle c_i,v\rangle =0,\forall i: T_i\neq 0,\) and \(\langle x,Tx\rangle\) is a Legendre form (i.e., \(Q\) is weakly lower semicontinuous, and, if \(x_k\) weakly converges to \(x_0\) and \(Q(x_k)\) converges to \(Q(x_0)\), then \(x_k\) strongly converges to \(x_0\)). Here, \(0^+F\) denotes the recession cone of \(F.\) The second assumption can be dropped in case \(m=1.\) In Theorem 5, the assumption that \(\langle x,Tx\rangle\) is a Legendre form is replaced by the request that \(T, T_i\) (\(i=1,2,\dots, m\)) are compact with closed range.
    0 references
    0 references
    quadratic program in Hilbert spaces
    0 references
    convex quadratic constraints
    0 references
    solution existence
    0 references
    Legendre form
    0 references
    recession cone
    0 references
    compact operator with closed range
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references