Extensions of cocycles for hyperfinite actions and applications (Q1358621)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 12:26, 12 February 2024 by RedirectionBot (talk | contribs) (‎Removed claims)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Extensions of cocycles for hyperfinite actions and applications
scientific article

    Statements

    Extensions of cocycles for hyperfinite actions and applications (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 May 1998
    0 references
    Let \(T: (X,{\mathcal B},\mu)\to (X,{\mathcal B},\mu)\) be an ergodic automorphism on a standard Borel probability space, and \(G\) a compact metric group. A measurable transformation \(\phi: X\to G\) (called a cocycle) gives rise to the skew product transformation \(T_\phi: X\times G\to X\times G\) defined by \[ T_\phi(x, g)= (Tx, \phi(x)g), \] again an automorphism of the product space (using Haar measure on \(G\)). Suppose \(S\in C(T)\), the centralizer of \(T\), then \(S\) ``lifts'' to the centralizer of \(T_\phi\) if there is a measurable solution \(f: X\to G\) to the equation \[ f(Tx)\phi(Sx)f(x)^{-1}= \phi(x). \] It turns out that many questions regarding skew products reduce to questions about this functional equation. In an earlier paper [Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 12, No. 4, 769-789 (1992; Zbl 0785.58030)], \textit{M. Lemańczyk}, \textit{P. Liardet} and \textit{J.-P. Thouvenot} approached this type of problem by considering the \(\mathbb{Z}^2\)-action \((S,T)\), defined by the commuting pair \(S\) and \(T\). The authors remark that this expresses the fact that the \(\mathbb{Z}\)-cocycle \(\phi:X\to G\) for \(T\) has been extended to a cocycle for the \(\mathbb{Z}^2\)-action \((S,T)\). This leads the authors to the study of the problem of extending a given cocycle for an action of a subgroup of some group of automorphisms to a cocycle of the whole group. Specifically, let \({\mathcal R}\) be a countable group which acts freely and ergodically on \((X,{\mathcal B},\mu)\), and let \(\mathcal H\) be a subgroup which also acts ergodically, then the authors answer questions of the following type: 1) Is the set of \({\mathcal H}\)-cocycles which have extensions to \({\mathcal R}\)-cocycles of first category in the set of \({\mathcal H}\)-cocycles? 2) Is the set of those \({\mathcal R}\)-cocycles whose restrictions to \({\mathcal H}\) are ergodic, residual in the set of \(\mathcal H\)-cocycles?
    0 references
    cocycles
    0 references
    ergodic equivalence relations
    0 references
    factors
    0 references

    Identifiers