Negative inflation and stability in symplectomorphism groups of ruled surfaces (Q720752)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 00:11, 14 February 2024 by RedirectionBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Negative inflation and stability in symplectomorphism groups of ruled surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Negative inflation and stability in symplectomorphism groups of ruled surfaces (English)
    0 references
    11 October 2011
    0 references
    The rational homotopy of the symplectomorphism groups \(G^g_\lambda\) of symplectic ruled surfaces \(M^g_\lambda-(\Sigma_g\times S^2, \lambda\sigma_{\Sigma_g}\oplus\sigma_{S^2})\) such that the areas of \(\Sigma_g\) and \(S^2\) are \(\lambda\) and 1, respectively, is computed as follows: let \(g> 0\), \(k\geq[g/2]\) and \(k<\lambda\leq k+ 1\), then \[ \begin{aligned} \dim\pi_i G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q} &= 0,\quad i= 0\text{ and }3< i< 4k+ 2g,\\ \dim\pi_1 G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q} & = 1,\quad g> 1,\quad \dim\pi_1 G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q}= 3,\;g= 1,\\ \dim\pi_2 G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q} &= 2g,\quad \dim\pi_3 G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q}= 1,\quad\text{and }\dim\pi_{4k+2g} G^g_\lambda\otimes\mathbb{Q}\geq 1\end{aligned} \] (Proposition 1.9). To derive Proposition 1.9, first a refinement of the negative inflation method in a symplectic four-manifold [\textit{F. Lalonde} and \textit{D. McDuff}, Math. Res. Lett. 3, No.~6, 769--778 (1996; Zbl 0874.57019); \textit{T.-J. Li} and \textit{M. Usher}, J. Symplectic Geom. 4, No.~1, 71--91 (2006; Zbl 1120.53052)] is given (Theorem 1.1). Using the negative inflation method and results on the homotopy type of \(G^g_\lambda\) [\textit{D. McDuff}, in: É. Ghys (ed.) et al., Essay on geometry and related topics. Mémoires dédiés à André Haefliger. Vol. 2. Genève: L'Enseignement Mathématique. Monogr. Enseign. Math. 38, 527--556 (2001; Zbl 1010.53064)], the following stability theorem on the homotopy type of \(G^g_\lambda\) is proved: Let \(k\geq[g/2]\), then the homotopy type of \(G^g_\lambda\) is constant. Moreover, as \(\lambda\) passes the integer \(k+1\), the groups \(\pi_i\), \(i= 0,\dots, 4k+ 2g- 1\) do not change (Theorem 1.2). In [McDuff, loc. cit.] it was shown that the homotopy limit \(G^g_\infty= \lim_{\lambda\to\infty} G^g_\lambda\) exists and is homotopic to \({\mathcal D}^g_0\), the identity component of the subgroup of diffeomorphisms that preserve the \(S^2\) fibers (Proposition 1.5). In [McDuff, loc. cit.] it is also shown that \[ \begin{aligned} \dim\pi_i({\mathcal D}^g_0\otimes\mathbb{Q}) &= 0,\quad i= 0\text{ and }i> 3,\\ \dim\pi_1({\mathcal D}^g_0)\otimes\mathbb{Q} &= 1,\quad g> 1,\quad\dim\pi_1({\mathcal D}^g_0)\times \mathbb{Q}= 3,\quad g= 0,\\ \dim\pi_2({\mathcal D}^g_0)\otimes\mathbb{Q} &= 2g,\quad \dim\pi_3({\mathcal D}^g_0)\otimes\mathbb{Q}= 1\end{aligned} \] (Proposition 1.6). Moreover, it was shown in [McDuff, loc. cit.] that \(\widetilde i: G^g_\lambda\to{\mathcal D}^g_0\) yields a surjective map on all rational homotopy groups. Theorem 1.2 improves this assertion showing that \(\widetilde i_*: \pi_j(G^g_\lambda\to \pi_j({\mathcal D}^g_\lambda))\), \(j= 0,\dots, 4k+ 2g-1\), are isomorphisms if \(k> [g/2]\) and \(k< \lambda\leq k+ 1\) (Proposition 1.7). Proposition 1.9 follows from Propositions 1.6 and 1.7 except for the statement on \(\pi_{4k+2g}(G^g_\lambda)\), which is shown via the study of Whitehead products (Proposition 1.8; cf. [\textit{O. Buşe}, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2010, No.~17, 3303--3340 (2010; Zbl 1241.57031)], details are given in \S3). Theorem 1.1 asserts that, for all \(\varepsilon> 0\), there exists a family of symplectic forms \(\tau_\mu\) on \((M^4,J,\tau_0)\) all taming \(J\) such that \[ [\tau_\mu]= [\tau_0]+\mu a_Z,\quad 0\leq \mu\leq {\tau_0(Z)\over m}- \varepsilon, \] where \(a_Z\) is the Poincaré dual of \(Z\), assuming \(J\) is \(\tau_0\)-tame and \(M\) admits an embedded \(J\)-holomorphic curve \(u: (\Sigma, j)\to (M^4, J)\) in a homology class \(Z\) with \(Z^2= -m\). This is proved in \S2 following McDuff's proof of Lemma 3.1 in [McDuff, loc. cit.]. In [McDuff, loc. cit.] a homotopy fibration \[ 0\to G^g_\lambda\to \text{Diff}_0(M^g_\lambda)\to{\mathcal A}^g_\lambda \] is exploited, where \({\mathcal A}^g_\lambda\) is the space of almost complex structures that are tamed by some form isotopic to \(\lambda\sigma_{\Sigma_g}\otimes \sigma_{S^2}\). \({\mathcal A}^g_\lambda\) has a stratification \(\bigcup_{0\leq k<[\lambda]}{\mathcal A}^g_{\lambda,k}\), where \({\mathcal A}^g_{\lambda,k}\) consists of almost complex structures that admit irreducible \(J\)-holomorphic curves in the class of \(A- kF\in H_2(M^g_\lambda,\mathbb{Z})\), where \(A\) and \(F\) are the homology classes of the base and fiber, respectively, if \(k\geq 1\) and the main strata \({\mathcal A}^g_{\lambda,0}\) consists of almost complex structures \(J\) that admit only non-negative self-intersection curves. Theorem 1.2 is proved analyzing this stratification and applying Theorem 1.1.
    0 references
    0 references
    ruled surface
    0 references
    symplectomorphism group
    0 references
    rational homotopy
    0 references
    negative inflation method
    0 references
    Whitehead products
    0 references
    stratification
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references