On the a.s. Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergence for stationary or orthogonal random variables (Q1825507)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 03:36, 28 July 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the a.s. Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergence for stationary or orthogonal random variables
scientific article

    Statements

    On the a.s. Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergence for stationary or orthogonal random variables (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    Considered are a.s. Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergences of stationary sequences \([X_ n]\) of random variables \(X_ n\) as \(n\to \infty\) and of stochastic processes X(t) as \(t\to \infty\) \((t>0)\). The random variables are given in the form \(X_ n=f\circ \partial^ n\) and the stochastic processes in the form \(f\circ \partial_ t\) with measurable measure- preserving transformations \(\partial\) and \(\partial_ t\) of a probability space (\(\Omega\),B,\(\mu)\). Further, f is a real function in \(L^ p\). Under the restriction \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\alpha p<1\), local and universal ergodicity a.s. (and for \(L^ p\)-norm) in Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergence are shown both for sequences and processes. For sequences, such convergence, in the case when the transformations were contractions, was earlier proved by R. Irmish. He then also showed by a counterexample that a.s. Cesàro-\(\alpha\) convergence failed in the case \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\alpha p=1\). Here the author considers more general transformations and accordingly gives a more general counterexample.
    0 references
    0 references
    Cesàro-\(\alpha \) convergences of stationary sequences
    0 references
    measure- preserving transformations
    0 references
    counterexample
    0 references