Determining merged relative scores (Q922397)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 02:36, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Determining merged relative scores
scientific article

    Statements

    Determining merged relative scores (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1990
    0 references
    \textit{F. S. Roberts} [ibid. 147, No.1, 30-52 (1990; Zbl 0704.92026)] formulated several properties expected from merging functions, say, of performance scores, relative to some basic performance and asked about all merging functions which have these individual properties (and some combinations of such properties). The present paper answers many of these questions and uses the answers to give alternative proofs and generalizations of some of Robert's results on the relative strength of these properties. Two typical results in this paper are: U: \({\mathbb{R}}^ n_+\times {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+\to {\mathbb{R}}\) satisfies \[ \forall x,y,s,t\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+,\quad c\in {\mathbb{R}}_+,\exists z\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+:\;U(x,z)- U(s,z)=c[U(y,z)-U(t,z)]\Rightarrow \] \[ \forall w\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+:\;U(x,w)-U(s,w)=c[U(y,w)-U(t,w)]\quad if,\text{ and } only\quad if, \] \[ \exists F,H:\;{\mathbb{R}}^ n_+\to {\mathbb{R}},\quad G:\;{\mathbb{R}}^ n_+\to {\mathbb{R}}\setminus \{0\},\quad \forall x,z\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+:\;U(x,z)=F(x)G(z)+H(z). \] (The positivity of c causes some minor difficulties). The continuous u: \({\mathbb{R}}^ n_+\to {\mathbb{R}}_+\) \(satisfies:\) \(\forall p,q\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+:\) \([u(p)>u(q)\Rightarrow (\forall r\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n:\) \(u(r,p)>u(r,q))]\) (vector-multiplication is done componentwise) if, and only if there exist a continuous, strictly monotonic h: \({\mathbb{R}}_+\to {\mathbb{R}}_+\) and constants \(c_ 1,...,c_ n\in {\mathbb{R}}\) such that: \[ u(p)=u(p_ 1,...,p_ n)=h(p_ 1^{c_ 1}p_ 2^{c_ 2}...p_ n^{c_ n}),\quad (p=(p_ 1,...,p_ n)\in {\mathbb{R}}^ n_+). \] Several results in both papers point towards the preferability of geometric means as merging functions.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    ordinal invariance
    0 references
    relative scores
    0 references
    ratio-invariance
    0 references
    interval invariance
    0 references
    homogeneity
    0 references
    proportionality
    0 references
    agreement
    0 references
    symmetry
    0 references
    boundedness
    0 references
    continuity
    0 references
    transitivity
    0 references
    translation equation
    0 references
    merging functions
    0 references
    performance scores
    0 references
    geometric means
    0 references