A dichotomy for linear spaces of Toeplitz operators (Q1270416)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 03:46, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A dichotomy for linear spaces of Toeplitz operators
scientific article

    Statements

    A dichotomy for linear spaces of Toeplitz operators (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 October 1999
    0 references
    For a Hilbert space \(H\), \(B(H)\) denotes the algebra of all bounded linear operators on \(H\); and the reflexive closure of a subspace \(S\) in \(B(H)\) is defined by: \[ \text{ref}(S)= \{T\in B(H); T(f)\in\overline{S(f)}, \forall f\in H\}. \] \(S\) is said to be reflexive if \(\text{ref}(S)= S\), and transitive if \(\text{ref}(S)= B(H)\). In this paper, the authors proved that: Every intransitive and ultraweakly closed subspace of the space \(F\) of all Toeplitz operators is reflexive. Every proper and ultraweakly closed subspace of \(F\) which contains the algebra of analytic Toeplitz operators is reflexive. This result extends a theorem of D. Sarason: the algebra of analytic Toeplitz operators is reflexive.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    ultraweakly closed subspace
    0 references