Elliptic versus parabolic regularization for the equation of prescribed mean curvature (Q1361818)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 03:04, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Elliptic versus parabolic regularization for the equation of prescribed mean curvature
scientific article

    Statements

    Elliptic versus parabolic regularization for the equation of prescribed mean curvature (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 June 1998
    0 references
    It is well-known that the Dirichlet problem for the equation of prescribed mean curvature \[ \text{div}((1+|Du|^2)^{-1/2}Du)+ h(x)= 0\quad\text{in }\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n,\;u=\Phi\quad\text{on }\partial\Omega\tag{1} \] has no classical solution if the curvature function \(h\) is too big. The authors investigate for this case what happens to the parabolic and elliptic regularizations of (1): \[ u_t= \text{div}((1+|Du|^2)^{-1/2} Du)+ h(x)\text{ in }\Omega\times (0,\infty),\tag{2} \] \[ u(x,t)= \Phi \text{ on } \partial\Omega\times (0,\infty),\;u(x,0)= u_0(x)\text{ on }\Omega \] and \[ \text{div}((1+ |Du^\varepsilon|^2)Du^\varepsilon+ \varepsilon Du^\varepsilon)+ h(x)= 0\quad\text{in }\Omega,\;u^\varepsilon= \Phi\quad\text{on }\partial\Omega.\tag{3} \] More precisely, they study the asymptotic behavior of the solutions of (2) and (3) for \(t\to\infty\) and \(\varepsilon\to 0\), respectively. It is shown that \(u(x,t)/t\) converges in \(L_2\) to a function \(v\) (called `parabolic growth function') which is the unique minimizer in \(\text{BV}(\overline\Omega)\cap L^2(\Omega)\) of the functional \(F(u)= \int_\Omega|Du|+ \int_\Omega(\textstyle{{1\over 2}} u^2-hu)dx\), whereas \(\varepsilon u^\varepsilon\) converges in \(W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)\) (it is assumed that \(\Phi=0\)) to an ``elliptic growth function'' \(w\) which is the unique minimizer in \(W^{1,2}_0(\Omega)\) of \[ J(u)= \int_\Omega|Du|dx+\int_\Omega({1\over 2}|Du|^2- hu)dx. \] Furthermore, the authors analyze the subset \(\Omega^*\) of \(\Omega\) on which \(v\) takes on its maximal value \(\lambda^*= \text{ess sup }v\). It is expected that \(\Omega^*\) is the set on which the solution \(u\) of (2) grows fastest and at constant rate \(\lambda^*\). What they show under the assumption \(\lambda^*>0\) is that \(\Omega^*\) has positive Lebesgue measure and that \(\Omega^*\) maximizes \((-P(G)+ \int_G h(x)dx)/|G|\) among all measurable subsets \(G\) of \(\Omega\) with maximum value equal to \(\lambda^*\), where \(|G|\) and \(P(G)\) denote the Lebesgue measure and the perimeter of \(G\), respectively. Here one should remember that \(|\int_G h(x)dx|< P(G)\) is a necessary condition for the classical solvability of (1). Defining \(\widetilde\Omega\) and \(\widetilde\lambda\) for the elliptic growth function \(w\) in an analoguous manner as \(\Omega^*\) and \(\lambda^*\) before and assuming that \(\widetilde\lambda>0\) and \(\widetilde\Omega\) has a nonempty interior, the authors prove \(\int_{\widetilde\Omega} h(x)dx\geq P(\widetilde\Omega)\) and \(\int_G h(x)dx\leq P(G)\) for all \(G\) compactly contained in \(\text{int}(\widetilde\Omega)\). For \(n= 2\), \(\Omega\) a rectangle and \(h=\text{const.}\), the parabolic growth function \(v\) is explicitly calculated. In the last chapter, the authors describe a number of numerical experiments.
    0 references
    equation of prescribed mean curvature
    0 references
    classical solvability
    0 references
    numerical experiments
    0 references

    Identifiers