Classical knot and link concordance (Q1801797)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 04:44, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Classical knot and link concordance
scientific article

    Statements

    Classical knot and link concordance (English)
    0 references
    31 January 1995
    0 references
    In an earlier paper, the author combined the knot concordance invariants of Levine with those of Casson-Gordon by considering the homology of the 2-fold branched cyclic cover. This approach is generalized in the present paper by simultaneously considering all the \(q\)-fold branched cyclic covers for \(q\) a prime power. As an application, a new example is given of a link which is a fusion of a boundary link but which is not concordant to a boundary link. Editorial remark: It has been pointed out by Daniel Moskovich on MathOverflow, \url{https://mathoverflow.net/questions/35468/widely-accepted-mathematical-results-that-were-later-shown-to-be-wrong/36097#36097}, that the proof of Theorem 1 of this paper contains a gap, as shown by S. Friedl in his PhD-Thesis (cf. [\textit{S. Friedl}, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 4, 893--934 (2004; Zbl 1067.57003)]).
    0 references
    Casson-Gordon invariants
    0 references
    slice knot
    0 references
    knot concordance invariants
    0 references
    \(q\)-fold branched cyclic covers
    0 references
    fusion of a boundary link
    0 references
    concordant to a boundary link
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers