Mail-in-rebate coupled with revenue sharing and downward direct discount for supply chain coordination (Q2627610)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:54, 5 March 2024 by Import240304020342 (talk | contribs) (Set profile property.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Mail-in-rebate coupled with revenue sharing and downward direct discount for supply chain coordination
scientific article

    Statements

    Mail-in-rebate coupled with revenue sharing and downward direct discount for supply chain coordination (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 May 2017
    0 references
    Summary: Use of sales promotion in the short-term to increase sales by revenues and market share for slow-moving items is common in the supply chain, though in such cases performances of chain members are suboptimal. On the contrary, a growing body of literature suggests that a high degree of integration is needed to optimise performances of all supply chain partners simultaneously. To address supply chain integration, when sales promotion is used, we consider a three-echelon supply chain. Demand depends on the selling price by the retailer and individual promotional mechanisms are chosen by channel members. We study game theoretical models to examine impacts of two promotional policies, e.g., mail-in-rebate (MIR) and downward direct discount (DDD) on supply chain coordination. Effectiveness and flexibility of MIR, MIR coupled with revenue sharing (RS) and DDD as coordination contracts are discussed analytically. We show that in decentralised decision making all channel members prefer manufacturers MIR and discard the possibility of distributers' MIR. Although to cut out channel conflict all chain members cooperate actively by complementing one another through contribution to invariant discount that is provided to customers, still, distributors and manufacturers prefer MIR and RS to DDD, whereas retailers prefers the reverse.
    0 references
    mail-in-rebate
    0 references
    MIR
    0 references
    revenue sharing
    0 references
    downward direct discount
    0 references
    DDD
    0 references
    supply chain coordination
    0 references
    supply chain management
    0 references
    SCM
    0 references
    supply chain integration
    0 references
    sales promotion
    0 references

    Identifiers