Burnside problem for measure preserving groups and for 2-groups of toral homeomorphisms (Q2439356)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 14:22, 4 August 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Burnside problem for measure preserving groups and for 2-groups of toral homeomorphisms
scientific article

    Statements

    Burnside problem for measure preserving groups and for 2-groups of toral homeomorphisms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 March 2014
    0 references
    A group \(G\) is said to be periodic if every \(g\in G\) has finite order, that is, if there exists a positive integer \(n\) with \(g^n=\mathrm{Id}\). One of the oldest problems in group theory was first posed by William Burnside in 1902: ``Let \(G\) be a finitely generated periodic group. Is \(G\) necessarily a finite group?'' In 1911, Schur proved that this is true for subgroups of \(\mathrm{GL}(k,\mathbb C)\), \(k\in\mathbb N\). But, in general, according to Golod the answer is negative. The Burnside problem is still open for groups of homeomorphisms (or diffeomorphisms) on closed manifolds. Very few examples are known. In this paper the authors proves that a finitely generated periodic group of homeomorphisms on the 2-torus that preserves a probability measure \(\mu\) is finite. Moreover if the group consists of homeomorphisms isotopic to the identity, then it is abelian and acts freely on \(\mathbb{T}^2\). In the appendix, the authors show that every finitely generated 2-group of toral homeomorphisms is finite.
    0 references
    Burnside problem
    0 references
    toral homeomorphisms
    0 references
    periodic group
    0 references
    finite group
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references