Which logic is the real fuzzy logic? (Q2492314)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 06:51, 5 August 2023 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Created a new Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Which logic is the real fuzzy logic?
scientific article

    Statements

    Which logic is the real fuzzy logic? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 2006
    0 references
    This position paper explains the author's view of the problem which logics should count as fuzzy logics. Recent years have seen an enormous growth of the number of logics termed fuzzy. For the present author the core points which qualify a logic for being a fuzzy logic are that it (i) should be able to model vagueness phenomena, that (ii) it should allow for graded notions of entailment, and that (iii) it should have tools to model commonsense reasoning.
    0 references
    mathematical fuzzy logic
    0 references
    many-valued logic
    0 references
    modeling vagueness
    0 references
    graded entailment
    0 references
    evaluated syntax
    0 references
    commonsense reasoning
    0 references
    fuzzy type theory
    0 references
    algebra of truth values
    0 references

    Identifiers