On the distributivity of fuzzy implications over continuous and Archimedean triangular conorms (Q969570)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 19:55, 19 March 2024 by Openalex240319060354 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the distributivity of fuzzy implications over continuous and Archimedean triangular conorms
scientific article

    Statements

    On the distributivity of fuzzy implications over continuous and Archimedean triangular conorms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    7 May 2010
    0 references
    This paper essentially proposes a mild generalization of the distributive functional equation \[ I((x,S_1(y,z))=S_2(I(x,y),I(x,z)),\quad x,y,z\in\,[0,1], \] where \(I\) is any function and \(S_1,S_2\) are t-conorms, already solved when \(S_1\) and \(S_2\) are both strict or both nilpotent, to the case when one is strict and the other one nilpotent. Section 2 contains only basic notations and definitions. The investigation is conducted in the same style as in the cited work numbered [6], exploiting some results, contained in Section 3, pertaining to the famous, additive Cauchy functional equation. Some remarks should be made with regard to the proof of Proposition 3.4: third line of this proof, page 1409, ``both sides of (5)'' instead of ``both sides of (6)'' and ``there exists \(x_1\in\,\,]x_0,x]\)'' instead of ``there exists \(x_1\in\,[x_0,x]\)'' on page 1410, just after formula (11), but mostly a passage is wrong, in the case \(x_0=\infty\), which begins seven lines from the bottom of page 1410. In fact, to cover this case, the author invokes Theorem 3.3, with \(a=x_0\), but in this theorem \(a\) is explicitly assumed to be a real, finite, positive number and not \(\infty\). I suppose that the proof should work in the following way: we show that, if \(x_0=\infty\), then \(f(x)=0\) for all \(x\geq 0\). If not, let \(x_1\) be a positive number such that \(0<f(x_1)<b\). Then, \(f(2x_1)=\min\{f(x_1)+f(x_1),b\}<b\) (note that \(f(2x_1)=b\) is incompatible with the nature of \(x_0\)), hence \(2f(x_1)<b\) and, by induction, we easily get \(nf(x_1)<b\) for any \(n\in \mathbb N\) which clearly contradicts \(f(x_1)>0\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    fuzzy connectives
    0 references
    fuzzy implication
    0 references
    functional equations
    0 references
    t-conorms
    0 references
    0 references