Inequalities and monotonicity of ratios for generalized hypergeometric function (Q1040874)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 22:41, 19 March 2024 by Openalex240319060354 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Inequalities and monotonicity of ratios for generalized hypergeometric function
scientific article

    Statements

    Inequalities and monotonicity of ratios for generalized hypergeometric function (English)
    0 references
    26 November 2009
    0 references
    Let \[ {_{q+1}F_q} \left( (a_{q+1}); (b_q) ;z \right) :=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(a_1)_{n} (a_2)_{n} (a_3)_{n} \cdots (a_{q+1})_{n}} {(b_1)_{n} (b_2)_{n} \cdots (b_q)_{n}}\;\frac{z^n}{{n!}} \] denote the generalized hypergeometric function. For \(q=2\) we have the two-sided inequality \[ \frac{1}{1+bx/c} < {_{2}F_1} \left( 1, b; c ;-x \right) < \frac{c(c+1)+(c-b)x}{c(c+1)+c(b+1)x}<1 \tag{1} \] when \(x>0\) and \(c>b>1\). These inequalities can be derived using Gauss continued fractions or Padé approximation of Stieltjes functions. The author notes that the lower bound in (1) is asymptotically precise at \(x=0\) and also coincides with \({_{2}F_1}(1,b;c;-x)\) at \(x=\infty\), but the same is not true for the upper bound which reduces to \((c-b)/[c(b+1)]\) at \(x=\infty\). The author provides a generalized Stieltjes representation of \({_{q+1}F_q} ((a_{q+1});(b_q);z)\) and uses it to prove the following result. Theorem 1. Suppose \(\delta>0\), \(b_k>a_k>0\), \(k=1,\dots,q\). The function \[ f\left(\sigma, (a_{q}); (b_q);\delta ;x\right)= \frac{{_{q+1}F_q} \left(\sigma, (a_{q})+\delta; (b_q)+\delta ;-x \right)}{{_{q+1}F_q} \left(\sigma, (a_{q}); (b_q) ;-x \right)} \] is monotone decreasing if \(\sigma>0\) and monotone increasing if \(\sigma< 0\) for all \(x>-1\). This leads to some nice bounds for \({_{q+1}F_q} \left(\sigma, (a_{q}); (b_q) ;-x \right)\) as follows. Theorem 2. For \(b_k>a_k>0\), \(k=1,\dotsc,q\), \(x>-1\) and \(\sigma \geq 1\) the inequality \[ \frac{1}{\left(1+x \prod_{i=1}^{q}(a_i/b_i)\right)^{\sigma}}< {_{q+1}F_q} \left(\sigma, (a_{q}); (b_q) ;-x \right) \tag{2} \] holds true. Inequality (2) was previously obtained by \textit{Y. L. Luke} [J. Approximation Theory 5, 41--65 (1972; Zbl 0225.33004)], for \(x>0\) and \(\sigma >0\), using a different method. Theorem 3. For \(b_k>a_k>1\), \(k=1,\dots,q\), \(x>0\) and \(0 < \sigma \leq 1\) the inequality \[ {_{q+1}F_q} \left(\sigma, (a_{q}); (b_q) ;-x \right)<\frac{1}{\left(1+x \prod_{i=1}^{q}[(a_i-1)/(b_i-1)]\right)^{\sigma}} \] holds true. These results can be combined to provide a two-sided inequality in the case \(\sigma=1\), generalizing (1), for which the lower bound is asymptotically precise at \(x=0\), the upper bound is asymptotically precise at \(x=\infty\) and both agree with values of \({_{q+1}F_q}(1, (a_{q}); (b_q) ;-x)\) at the endpoints of \([0, \infty]\). The paper also includes another method to deduce the second Thomae relation for \({_{3}F_2}(1)\), a derivation of an integral representation of \({_{4}F_3}(x)\) in terms of the Appell function \({F_3}\), and some related open questions and conjectures.
    0 references
    0 references
    generalized hypergeometric function
    0 references
    generalized Stieltjes function
    0 references
    hypergeometric inequality
    0 references
    Thomae relations
    0 references
    0 references