Regular solutions in vacuum Brans-Dicke theory compared to vacuum Einstein theory (Q903798)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:26, 26 March 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q58918216, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711439739529)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Regular solutions in vacuum Brans-Dicke theory compared to vacuum Einstein theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Regular solutions in vacuum Brans-Dicke theory compared to vacuum Einstein theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 January 2016
    0 references
    Summary: We will confront some static spherically symmetric vacuum Brans-Dicke solutions in the Jordan and Einstein Frames with the Robertson parameters. While the regular solution in the vacuum Einstein theory is just the Schwarzschild black hole, the same in the Jordan frame Brans-Dicke theory is shown to represent not a black hole but a traversable wormhole. But, in this case, the valid range of \(\omega\) becomes too narrow to yield the observed weak field Robertson parameters at the positive mass mouth. The corresponding solution in the Einstein frame also provides a regular wormhole, and it yields the correct parametric values but only up to ``one and half order.'' We argue that a second-order contribution can in principle distinguish between the signatures of the regular wormhole and the singular Buchdahl solution in the Einstein frame. Thus, at the level of regular solutions, Brans-Dicke theory in each frame predicts effects very different from those of Einstein's theory. To our knowledge, these theoretical distinctions seem not to have received adequate attention so far.
    0 references

    Identifiers