Noether's problem and unramified Brauer groups (Q2446027)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 07:20, 19 April 2024 by Importer (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Noether's problem and unramified Brauer groups
scientific article

    Statements

    Noether's problem and unramified Brauer groups (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 April 2014
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be a field and \(G\) be a finite group. Let \(G\) act on the rational function field \(K(x(g):g\in G)\) by \(K\) automorphisms defined by \(g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)\) for any \(g,h\in G\). Denote by \(K(G)\) the fixed field \(K(x(g):g\in G)^G\). Noether's problem then asks whether \(K(G)\) is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over \(K\). The Bogomolov multiplier \(B_0(G)\) of a finite group \(G\) is defined as the subgroup of the Schur multiplier consisting of the cohomology classes vanishing after restriction to all abelian subgroups of \(G\). A necessary condition for the positive answer of Noether's problem is that the Bogomolov multiplier \(B_0(G)\) is trivial. The authors study the Bogomolov multiplier of the groups of order \(p^5\) for an odd prime \(p\). They show that \(B_0(G)\neq 0\) if and only if \(G\) belongs to the isoclinism family \(\Phi_{10}\) in James' classification of groups of order \(p^5\) \textit{R. James} [Math. Comput. 34, 613--637 (1980; Zbl 0428.20013)]. The triviality of the Bogomolov multiplier for \(G\notin \Phi_{10}\) was obtained independently with other methods by \textit{P. Moravec} [J. Algebra 372, 320--327 (2012; Zbl 1303.13010)].
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Noether's problem
    0 references
    rationality problem
    0 references
    unramified Brauer groups
    0 references
    Bogomolov multipliers
    0 references
    rationality
    0 references
    retract rationality
    0 references
    0 references