The core model for almost linear iterations (Q1602852)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 11:10, 4 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The core model for almost linear iterations
scientific article

    Statements

    The core model for almost linear iterations (English)
    0 references
    24 June 2002
    0 references
    Core models are one of the key technical tools for proving lower bounds of consistency strength in the large cardinal hierarchy. The first core model was constructed by \textit{A. Dodd} and \textit{R. Jensen} [Ann. Math. Logic 20, 43-75 (1981; Zbl 0457.03051)] and it was associated to the large cardinal strength of a measurable cardinal. Generalizations of the Dodd-Jensen construction due to \textit{P. Koepke} [Ph. D. Thesis, Freiburg i. Br. (1983)], \textit{W. J. Mitchell} [Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 95, 229-260 (1984; Zbl 0539.03030)] and \textit{R. Jensen} [handwritten notes 1988-1990] yielded a good analysis of core model theory in the Dodd-Jensen style up to a strong cardinal. Building on work of \textit{D. A. Martin} and \textit{J. R. Steel} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 7, 1-73 (1994; Zbl 0808.03035)], \textit{W. J. Mitchell} and \textit{J. R. Steel} [Fine structure and iteration trees, Lecture Notes in Logic 3. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1994; Zbl 0805.03042)] developed fine-structural inner models for Woodin cardinals, and \textit{J. R. Steel} [The core model iterability problem, Lecture Notes in Logic 8. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1996; Zbl 0864.03035)] constructed a core model associated to the large cardinal strength of a Woodin cardinal. These constructions are technically different from the Dodd-Jensen approach. The most striking difference is that the Mitchell-Steel theory needs the additional assumption of a measurable cardinal to prove the existence of a core model. There is a conspicuous gap between the upper bound of the strength of Dodd-Jensen models (a strong cardinal) and the strength of the Mitchell-Steel models (a Woodin cardinal). One of the statements that fall into this gap is the statement called \textbf{VD\#12}. \textit{K. Hauser} and \textit{R.-D. Schindler} [Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 103, 109-153 (2000; Zbl 0961.03041)] computed the strength of \textbf{VD\#12} in the base theory ZFC \(+\) ``there is a measurable cardinal'' using the Mitchell-Steel core model. The strength of \textbf{VD\#12} is the same as that of ``there is a strictly increasing sequence \(\langle \kappa_i\); \(i\in\omega\rangle\) of \(\lambda^+\)-strong cardinals (where \(\lambda = \sup \{\kappa_i\); \(i\in\omega\}\))''. The paper under review is the published version of the author's Habilitationsschrift [Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2001)]. Schindler combines ideas from the Dodd-Jensen approach and the Mitchell-Steel approach to develop the core model theory for the large cardinal strength of \textbf{VD\#12} in ZFC (i.e., without an additional measurable cardinal). As an application (\S 9), he derives the Steel-Hauser-Schindler consistency strength computation in the base theory ZFC.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    strong cardinals
    0 references
    core model
    0 references
    zero handgrenade
    0 references
    iteration trees
    0 references
    Victoria Delfino 12
    0 references
    consistency strength
    0 references
    large cardinal hierarchy
    0 references
    0 references