On the product of consecutive elements of an arithmetic progression (Q1068877)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:05, 17 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the product of consecutive elements of an arithmetic progression
scientific article

    Statements

    On the product of consecutive elements of an arithmetic progression (English)
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    \textit{P. Erdős} and \textit{J. L. Selfridge} [Ill. J. Math. 19, 292-301 (1975; Zbl 0295.10017)] proved that the product of \(k\geq 2\) consecutive integers cannot be a proper power and asked for an analogous result concerning the product of consecutive integers of an arithmetic progression. Using the method of the above-mentioned paper, the author proves that the product \((n+d)(n+2d)\cdot \cdot \cdot (n+kd)\) cannot be a proper power provided k is sufficiently large; in fact, for all cases, the largest k is \[ \leq \quad \max \{3\cdot 10^ 4, (3/2) \exp [d(d+2)(d+1)^{1/3}]\}. \]
    0 references
    higher degree diophantine equations
    0 references
    perfect power
    0 references
    product of consecutive integers
    0 references
    arithmetic progression
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers