Generally covariant quantum field theory and scaling limits (Q580674)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 11:23, 18 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Generally covariant quantum field theory and scaling limits
scientific article

    Statements

    Generally covariant quantum field theory and scaling limits (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    The authors try to eliminate the rigid metric structure of space-time and to characterize the generally covariant quantum field theory in terms of the allowed germs of families of states. Here general covariance means that the field equations are independent of the coordinate system used to describe 4-dimensional smooth manifold \({\mathcal M}\). Let X be a vector field on \({\mathcal M}^ n\) with the components \(X^{\mu}(x)=x^{\mu}- \vec x^{\mu}+0(x-\bar y)^ 2\), x(\(\lambda)\) an orbit \(dx^{\mu}(\lambda)/d\lambda = \lambda^{-1}X^{\mu}(x(\lambda))\) with \(x(1)=P\), and \(\eta^ xP\) the tangent vector of x(\(\lambda)\) at \(\lambda =0\). Let \(f^{(n)}\) be a smooth function (monomial) on \({\mathcal M}^ n\) to \({\mathfrak C}\) with support in \({\mathcal O}\) in every argument, \({\mathcal A}({\mathcal O})\) formal linear combinations of the \(f^{(n)}\)'s of different degrees n, \(\hat {\mathcal A}(\hat {\mathcal O})\) the similar tensor algebra of test functions with support in \(\hat {\mathcal O}=\eta {\mathcal O}\) and \(\hat f^{(n)}\in \hat {\mathcal A}(\hat {\mathcal O})\). They derive two transformations \[ (\beta \hat f^{(n)})(P_ 1,...,P_ n)=\hat f^{(n)}(\eta P_ 1,...,\eta P_ n) \] and \[ (\beta^{- 1}\alpha_{\lambda}\beta \hat f^{(n)})(z_ 1,...,z_ n)=\hat f^{(n)}(\lambda^{-1}z_ 1,...,\lambda^{-1}z_ n). \] Next let a state \(\omega\) on \({\mathcal A}\) denote a linear functional on \({\mathcal A}\) with \(\omega (1)=1\) and \(\omega (A^*A)\geq 0\). The state is equal to a vacuum expectation of a representation \(\pi_{\omega}(A)\) of \(A\in {\mathcal A}\), and can give a detector when \({\mathcal M}=R^ 4\). A folium \({\mathcal F}_ i({\mathcal O}_ i)\) means the equivalent class of a representation \(\pi_ i\) of \({\mathcal A}({\mathcal O}_ i)\), and a scaling limit state at \(\bar P\in {\mathcal M}\) is the one on \(\hat {\mathcal A}\) given by \(\omega_{\bar P}^{(n)}(\hat f^{(n)})=\lim_{\lambda \to 0}N(\lambda)^ n\omega^{(n)}(\alpha_{\lambda}\beta \hat f^{(n)})\), where \(N(\lambda)\geq 0\) is a monotone function for \(\lambda\in (0,\infty].\) The authors' first result is the following: Uniformly defined scaling limit states are covariant under dilations and invariant under translations. Their basic main problems are the following (i) and (ii): (i) May an open covering \({\mathcal O}=\cup {\mathcal O}_ i\) derive different folia \({\mathcal F}({\mathcal O})\) whose restrictions to \({\mathcal O}_ i\) are given \({\mathcal F}_ i({\mathcal O}_ i)?\) (ii) What are the compatibility conditions for the set \(\{{\mathcal F}_ i({\mathcal O}_ i)\}\) so that an extension \({\mathcal F}({\mathcal O})\) may exist? Relating to the problems they show that the Borchers algebra \({\mathcal A}({\mathcal O})\) is free.
    0 references
    eliminate the rigid metric structure of space-time
    0 references
    covariant quantum field theory
    0 references
    allowed germs of families of states
    0 references
    tensor algebra of test functions
    0 references
    vacuum expectation of a representation
    0 references
    folium
    0 references
    scaling limit state
    0 references
    covariant under dilations
    0 references
    invariant under translations
    0 references
    Borchers algebra
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references