Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (Q1102916)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 16:18, 18 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems
scientific article

    Statements

    Comparison of peak and RMS gains for discrete-time systems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    A convolution system can have a frequency response which is small for all frequencies, yet still greatly amplify the peaks of signals passing through it. For finite-dimensional systems, however, we establish the simple bound \(\| h\|_ 1\leq (2n+1)\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\), where \(\| h\|_ 1\) is the peak gain of the system, \(\| h\|_{H^{\infty}}\) is the maximum frequency response of the system, and n its dimension. The same result for continuous-time systems is due to Gohberg and Doyle and it is mentioned in ``Robust control of multivariable and large scale systems'', Final Tech. Report, Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN (1985). The bound implies that \(H^{\infty}\)-optimal controllers, which minimize the maximum of some disturbance-to-error transfer function, cannot have very large peak gains from the disturbance to error.
    0 references
    RMS gain
    0 references
    peak gain
    0 references
    \(H^{\infty }\)-optimal controllers
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references