The trap of complacency in predicting the maximum (Q879259)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 18:40, 25 June 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The trap of complacency in predicting the maximum
scientific article

    Statements

    The trap of complacency in predicting the maximum (English)
    0 references
    8 May 2007
    0 references
    Let \(B^{\mu}=(B^{\mu}_{t})_{0\leq t \leq T}\) be a standard Brownian motion with drift \(\mu \in {\mathbb R}\). The authors consider the optimal prediction problem: \(V= \inf_{0\leq \tau \leq T} {\text E}(B^{\mu}_{\tau}- S^{\mu}_{T})^{2},\) where \(S^{\mu}_{t}=\max_{0\leq s \leq t} B^{\mu}_{s}\), for \(0\leq t \leq T\), and the infimum is taken over all stopping times \(\tau\) of \(B^{\mu}\). First, the optimal prediction problem is reduced to a parabolic free-boundary problem. If \(\mu >0\), it is shown that the following stopping time is optimal: \({\tau}_{*}=\inf\{t_{*}\leq t\leq T \mid b_{1}(t)\leq S^{\mu}_{t} - B^{\mu}_{t}\leq b_{2}(t)\}\), where \(t_{*}\in [0,T)\) and the functions \(t\mapsto b_{1}(t)\) and \(t\mapsto b_{2}(t)\) are continuous on \([t_{*},T]\) with \(b_{1}(T)=0\) and \(b_{2}(T)=1/2{\mu}\), and \(b_{1}\) is decreasing and \(b_{2}\) is increasing on \([t_{*}, T]\) with \(b_{1}(t_{*})= b_{2}(t_{*})\) when \(t_{*}\neq 0\). If \(\mu\leq 0\), then the stopping time given by \({\tau}_{*}=\inf\{0\leq t\leq T \mid S^{\mu}_{t} - B^{\mu}_{t}\geq b_{1}(t)\}\) is optimal. In this case, the function \(t \mapsto b_{1}(t)\) is continuous on \([0,T]\), and decreasing on \([z_{*},T]\) and increasing on \([0,z_{*})\) for some \(z_{*}\in [0,T)\) with \(z_{*} =0\) if \(\mu = 0\). The method of proof is based on local time-space calculus [\textit{G. Peskir}, J. Theor. Probab. 18, No. 3, 499--535 (2005; Zbl 1085.60033), Math. Finance 15, No. 1, 169--181 (2005; Zbl 1109.91028) and Finance Stoch. 9, No. 2, 251--267 (2005; Zbl 1092.91029)]. In the case \(\mu >0\), the authors derive a coupled system of nonlinear Volterra integral equations of the second kind and show that the pair of optimal boundaries \(b_{1}\) and \(b_{2}\) can be characterized as the unique solution to this system. This also leads to an explicit formula for \(V\) in terms of \(b_{1}\) and \(b_{2}\). If \(\mu\leq 0\), the system of two Volterra equations reduces to one Volterra equation. For \(\mu = 0\), the considered optimal prediction problem with a closed form expression for \(b_{1}\) was solved by \textit{S. E. Graversen, G. Peskir} and \textit{A. N. Shiryaev} [Theory Probab. Appl. 45, No. 1, 41--50 (2000) and Teor. Veroyatn. Primen. 45, No. 1, 125--136 (2000; Zbl 0982.60082)] using the method of time change [\textit{J. L. Pedersen}, Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 75, No. 4, 205--219 (2003; Zbl 1032.60038)] which, however, cannot be extended to the case \(\mu \neq 0\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Brownian motion
    0 references
    optimal prediction
    0 references
    optimal stopping
    0 references
    local time-space calculus
    0 references
    nonlinear Volterra integral equation
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references