Multiplicity one theorems (Q601874)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:16, 3 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiplicity one theorems
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiplicity one theorems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    29 October 2010
    0 references
    Consider the standard upper left hand corner embedding of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(F)\) in \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\) where \(F\) is a non-Archimedean local field of characteristic \(0\). The main result is the following ``multiplicity \(\leq 1\)'' theorem and its analogues for orthogonal and unitary groups: If \(\pi_n, \pi_{n+1}\) are irreducible, admissible representations of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(F), \mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\) respectively, then \(\dim (\Hom_{\mathrm{GL}_n(F)}(\pi_{n+1}|\mathrm{GL}_n(F), \pi_n) ) \leq 1\). Analogues of this theorem for Archimedean \(F\) were obtained in special cases earlier. ``Multiplicity \(\leq 1\)'' theorems have several applications to the study of automorphic \(L\)-functions. But a more difficult question is to find when the multiplicity is 1. Recently, the above theorem has been used to deduce the analogous result when \(F\) has positive characteristic. The transposition map on \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\) is an anti-automorphism of order \(2\) which leaves \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(F)\) stable. The above theorem is deduced from: ``Consider the (adjoint) action of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(F) \times \mathrm{GL}_n(F)\) on \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\) given by \((g_1,g_2)h = g_1hg_2^{-1}\). Then, any invariant distribution on \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(F)\) with respect to this action is also invariant with respect to transposition.'' Employing an old result due to Bernstein, the above theorem also provides an independent proof of Kirillov's conjecture for non-Archimedean fields of characteristic \(0\). The analogues of the two stated theorems are proved for unitary groups also. Recently, Waldspurger has adapted the proofs to include special orthogonal groups. The proof of the above theorem uses the powerful Bernstein localization principle and a variant of Frobenius reciprocity from 1984. The authors also point out that there is still no simple explanation why the invariant distributions always turn out to be symmetric.
    0 references
    multiplicity one
    0 references
    invariant distribution
    0 references
    Bernstein localization principle
    0 references
    Frobenius descent
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers