Competitive rational expectations equilibria without apology (Q2434348)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:33, 7 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Competitive rational expectations equilibria without apology
scientific article

    Statements

    Competitive rational expectations equilibria without apology (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 February 2014
    0 references
    The authors consider \textit{A. S. Kyle}'s model of a market of a single risky asset that is traded among noise traders, \(N\) informed speculators, and market makers [Rev. Econ. Stud. 56, No. 3, 317--355 (1989; Zbl 0669.90016)]. Their aim is ``to find out conditions under which one can safely use competitive rational expectations equilibria (REE) as an approximation of the `true' strategic equilibria'' (Nash equilibria). Speculators' information, generating asymmetry, are private signals about the realization of an asset's liquidation value. A speculator chooses a demand schedule which depends on his private information and derives utility which depends on the return of asset trading. ``When \(N\) grows at the same rate as noise trading, prices in competitive and in strategic REE converge to each other at a rate of \(1/N\). Equilibria in the two scenarios are close when noise trading volume per informed trader is large in relation to risk-bearing capacity. Both equilibria converge to the competitive equilibrium of a limit continuum economy as the market becomes large at a slower rate of \(1/pN\). The results extend to endogenous information acquisition and the connections with the Grossman-Stiglitz paradox are highlighted.''
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    strategic equilibrium
    0 references
    information acquisition
    0 references
    rate of convergence
    0 references
    Grossman-Stiglitz paradox
    0 references
    0 references