The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample (Q2445191)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 10:01, 8 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample
scientific article

    Statements

    The direct image of the relative dualizing sheaf needs not be semiample (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 April 2014
    0 references
    The authors provide details for the proof of Fujita's second theorem [\textit{T. Fujita}, Proc. Japan Acad., Ser. A 54, 183--184 (1978; Zbl 0412.32029)] claiming that if a fibration \(f: X\to B\) of a compact Kähler manifold \(X\) over a projective curve \(B\) is given, then the direct image sheaf \(V:=f_*\omega_{X/B}\) splits as a direct sum \(V=A\oplus Q\), where \(A\) is an ample vector bundle and \(Q\) is a unitary flat bundle. The main result is Theorem 1.2, claiming that \(V\) needs not be semiample; this theorem answers the question posed by Fujita in 1982.
    0 references
    Kähler manifold
    0 references
    projective curve
    0 references
    dualizing sheaf
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references