Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6067108
DOI10.1007/S11229-019-02177-XzbMath1525.81006arXiv1903.03863OpenAlexW2920799065MaRDI QIDQ6067108
Giuseppe Sergioli, Christian de Ronde, Hector Freytes
Publication date: 14 December 2023
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03863
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum computation (81P68) Quantum state spaces, operational and probabilistic concepts (81P16)
Related Items (3)
Quantum cognitive triad: semantic geometry of context representation ⋮ A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations ⋮ Measuring quantum superpositions. (Or, ``It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to quantum mechanics
- Towards quantum computational logics
- Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Quantum probability from subjective likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule
- Deriving Born's rule from an inference to the best explanation
- Do spins have directions?
- Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
- Quantum computational logic
- Reasoning in quantum theory. Sharp and unsharp quantum logics.
- Towards a multi target quantum computational logic
- The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. I: Kochen-Specker contextuality and global intensive valuations
- A matrix representation of quantum circuits over non-adjacent qudits
- Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures
- The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. II. Quantum superpositions and intensive values
- Fuzzy propositional logic associated with quantum computational gates
- Holistic logical arguments in quantum computation
- ‘PROBABILISTIC KNOWLEDGE’ AS ‘OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE’ IN QUANTUM MECHANICS: POTENTIAL IMMANENT POWERS INSTEAD OF ACTUAL PROPERTIES
- Representing continuoust-norms in quantum computation with mixed states
- Quantum computer with mixed states and four-valued logic
- Quantum theory of probability and decisions
- Quantum computational logic with mixed states
- IMMANENT POWERS VERSUS CAUSAL POWERS (PROPENSITIES, LATENCIES AND DISPOSITIONS) IN QUANTUM MECHANICS
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
- Proof That Probability Density Approaches<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>in Causal Interpretation of the Quantum Theory
- Quantum computing
- Quantum theory: concepts and methods
This page was built for publication: Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?
