Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2289679
Abstract: In this paper we intend to discuss the importance of providing a physical representation of quantum superpositions which goes beyond the mere reference to mathematical structures and measurement outcomes. This proposal goes in the opposite direction to the project present in orthodox contemporary philosophy of physics which attempts to "bridge the gap" between the quantum formalism and common sense "classical reality" --precluding, right from the start, the possibility of interpreting quantum superpositions through non-classical notions. We will argue that in order to restate the problem of interpretation of quantum mechanics in truly ontological terms we require a radical revision of the problems and definitions addressed within the orthodox literature. On the one hand, we will discuss the need of providing a formal redefinition of superpositions which captures explicitly their contextual character. On the other hand, we will attempt to replace the focus on the measurement problem, which concentrates on the justification of measurement outcomes from "weird" superposed states, and introduce the superposition problem which focuses instead on the conceptual representation of superpositions themselves. In this respect, after presenting three necessary conditions for objective physical representation, we will provide arguments which show why the classical (actualist) representation of physics faces severe difficulties to solve the superposition problem. Finally, we will also argue that, if we are willing to abandon the (metaphysical) presupposition according to which 'Actuality = Reality', then there is plenty of room to construct a conceptual representation for quantum superpositions.
Recommendations
- The paraconsistent logic of quantum superpositions
- Quantic superpositions and the geometry of complex Hilbert spaces
- A LOGICAL ACCOUNT OF QUANTUM SUPERPOSITIONS
- Quantum superpositions cannot be epistemic
- The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. II. Quantum superpositions and intensive values
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1118850 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 872244 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3069508 (Why is no real title available?)
- Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Classical Logical Versus Quantum Conceptual Thought: Examples in Economics, Decision Theory and Concept Theory
- Consistent Quantum Theory
- Do spins have directions?
- Everettian quantum mechanics and physical probability: against the principle of ``State Supervenience
- Hilbert space quantum mechanics is noncontextual
- Interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities
- Interpreting the Modal Kochen-Specker theorem: possibility and many worlds in quantum mechanics
- Kochen-Specker theorem in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Many worlds: decoherent or incoherent?
- Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory and reality.
- Modality, potentiality, and contradiction in quantum mechanics
- Open or closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the relation between classical and quantum mechanics
- Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics
- Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics
- Quantum particles as conceptual entities: a possible explanatory framework for quantum theory
- Quantum probability from subjective likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule
- Quantum structure in cognition
- Quantum theory is an information theory. The operational framework and the axioms
- Quantum theory of probability and decisions
- Some historical and philosophical aspects of quantum probability theory and its interpretation
- TIME, CHANCE AND QUANTUM THEORY
- The Emergent Multiverse
- The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- The paraconsistent logic of quantum superpositions
- Was Einstein really a realist?
- Why QBism is not the Copenhagen interpretation and what John Bell might have thought of it
- `Einselection' of pointer observables: the new H-theorem?
- `Probabilistic knowledge' as `objective knowledge' in quantum mechanics: potential immanent powers instead of actual properties
Cited in
(14)- Measuring quantum superpositions. (Or, ``It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.)
- Quantic superpositions and the geometry of complex Hilbert spaces
- Representational realism, closed theories and the quantum to classical limit
- The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. I: Kochen-Specker contextuality and global intensive valuations
- A non-spatial reality
- The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. II. Quantum superpositions and intensive values
- Understanding quantum superarrivals using the Bohmian model
- Superluminal observers do not explain quantum superpositions
- Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?
- An efficient approach for quantum entanglement purification
- Quantum jumps, superpositions, and the continuous evolution of quantum states
- Quantum superpositions cannot be epistemic
- A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations
- On the conceptuality interpretation of quantum and relativity theories
This page was built for publication: Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2289679)
