Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?

DOI10.1007/s11229-019-02177-xzbMath1525.81006arXiv1903.03863OpenAlexW2920799065MaRDI QIDQ6067108

Giuseppe Sergioli, Christian de Ronde, Hector Freytes

Publication date: 14 December 2023

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03863

zbMATH Keywords

reliabilityquantum computationquantum probabilityquantum computational logic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum computation (81P68) Quantum state spaces, operational and probabilistic concepts (81P16)

Related Items (2)

Quantum cognitive triad: semantic geometry of context representation ⋮ A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Against the empirical viability of the Deutsch-Wallace-Everett approach to quantum mechanics
• Towards quantum computational logics
• Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics
• Quantum probability from subjective likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule
• Deriving Born's rule from an inference to the best explanation
• Do spins have directions?
• Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
• Quantum computational logic
• Reasoning in quantum theory. Sharp and unsharp quantum logics.
• Towards a multi target quantum computational logic
• The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. I: Kochen-Specker contextuality and global intensive valuations
• A matrix representation of quantum circuits over non-adjacent qudits
• Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures
• The logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics. II. Quantum superpositions and intensive values
• Fuzzy propositional logic associated with quantum computational gates
• Holistic logical arguments in quantum computation
• ‘PROBABILISTIC KNOWLEDGE’ AS ‘OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE’ IN QUANTUM MECHANICS: POTENTIAL IMMANENT POWERS INSTEAD OF ACTUAL PROPERTIES
• Representing continuoust-norms in quantum computation with mixed states
• Quantum computer with mixed states and four-valued logic
• Quantum theory of probability and decisions
• Quantum computational logic with mixed states
• IMMANENT POWERS VERSUS CAUSAL POWERS (PROPENSITIES, LATENCIES AND DISPOSITIONS) IN QUANTUM MECHANICS
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
• Proof That Probability Density Approaches<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>in Causal Interpretation of the Quantum Theory
• Quantum computing
• Quantum theory: concepts and methods

This page was built for publication: Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?