Sharply transitive sets in \(\operatorname{PGL}_2(K)\) (Q2238267)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 23:23, 26 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sharply transitive sets in \(\operatorname{PGL}_2(K)\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Sharply transitive sets in \(\operatorname{PGL}_2(K)\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1 November 2021
    0 references
    In this paper, the author provides a very short, elegant and elementary proof of the fact that any subset of \(\mathrm{PGL}(2,q)\), containing the identity and acting sharply transitively on the points of the projective line \(\mathrm{PG}(1,q)\) must in fact be a subgroup. Represent an element of \(\mathrm{PGL}(2,q)\) by a \(2\times 2\)-matrix \(A\) with entries \(a_{ij}\) (defined up to scalar multiple). Then the main lemma says that for a regular subset of \(\mathrm{PGL}(2,q)\) containing four elements \(A\), \(B\), \(C\), \(D\) with \(a_{11}=b_{12}=c_{21}=d_{22}=0\), necessarily \(a_{12}b_{22}c_{11}d_{21}=a_{21}b_{11}c_{22}d_{12}\). Its proof is a simple consequence of the fact that the product of all non-zero elements in a finite field is \(-1\). The proof of the main theorem is a straightforward (yet clever) application of this lemma.
    0 references
    projective linear group
    0 references
    sharply transitive subset
    0 references
    flock
    0 references

    Identifiers