Cancellation in algebraic twisted sums on \(\operatorname{GL}_m\) (Q2121265)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 13:55, 28 July 2024 by ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) (‎Changed an Item)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Cancellation in algebraic twisted sums on \(\operatorname{GL}_m\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Cancellation in algebraic twisted sums on \(\operatorname{GL}_m\) (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 April 2022
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal{K}(n)\) be a (non-exceptional) isotypic trace function associated to some sheaf \(\mathcal{F}\) modulo \(q\), \(q\) being assumed to be a prime in the paper. Let \(a(n)\) be an arithmetic function satisfying the conditions below. The paper is concerned with nontrivial upper bound for the sum \[ \sum_{n\le X}a(n)\mathcal{K}(n). \tag{1} \] The authors are concerned with the range of possibilities that give rise to nontrivial bounds compared to \(q\) (\(X\gg q^{\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon}\)). They state ``we do not need to know specific deep properties of trace functions; it is quite enough to use the facts which are summarized in [\textit{Fouvry} et al., Duke Math. J. 163, No. 9, 1683--1736 (2014; Zbl 1318.11103); Ann. Inst. Fourier 67, No. 1, 423--449 (2017; Zbl 1392.11060)]. Thus, we shall not recall the exact definitions.'' They separated the role of \(a\) and \(\mathcal{K}\), the treatment of \(\mathcal{K}\)-part being made by Lemma 2.2 which follows from Lemma 2.1 due to \textit{M. Korolev} and \textit{I. Shparlinski} [Pac. J. Math. 304, No. 2, 505--522 (2020; Zbl 1469.11267)] by orthogonality of additive characters. Lemma 2.2 gives the estimate \[ \sum_{n=1}^{X}\mathcal{K}(an)\overline{\mathcal{K}(bn)}\ll Xq^{-\frac{1}{2}}+q^{\frac{1}{2}}\log q \] valid save for an exceptional set. The arithmetic function controls the process. It is to satisfy the \(2\)-norm estimate \[ \sum_{n\le X}{a(n)|^2}\ll X(\log X)^{\gamma-1}{\left( \frac{\log\log q}{\log q} \right)}^\gamma, \tag{2} \] and the sieve property \[ \sum_{\substack{n\le X \\ (n,P)=1}}|a(n)|\ll_\varepsilon X(\log X)^{\gamma-1}{\left( \frac{\log\log q}{\log q} \right)}^\gamma, \tag{3} \] for some \(\gamma\ge 0\), where \(P\) is the product of all primes in \([Y,Z)]\) and where \[ Y= (\log q)^{c+4}, \quad Z= q^{\varepsilon+3}. \tag{4} \] Under the above conditions, Theorem 1.1 asserts \[ \sum_{n\le X}a(n)\mathcal{K}(n)\ll X(\log X)^{\gamma-1}{\left( \frac{\log\log q}{\log q} \right)}^\gamma+\frac{X}{\log q}{\left( \frac{\log X}{\log q} \right)}^\gamma. \] This reduces the problem to the search for the arithmetic functions satisfying the above estimates. \S 4 gives a concise statement of the theory of automorphic \(L\)-functions. It is shown that the coefficients \(\lambda_\pi(n)\) satisfy the conditions and \(\lambda_\pi(n)\) can be taken as \(a(n)\) in Theorem 1.1. There are several other cases with related coefficients studied (and also the case multiplied by the Möbius function). In each case with ingenious methods, similar results are obtained. The Sato-Tate conjecture (now a theorem) is needed for the proof of Theorem 1.7.
    0 references
    multiplicative functions
    0 references
    trace functions
    0 references
    automorphic \(L\)-functions
    0 references
    Möbius function
    0 references
    sieve method
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references