Control of systems to sets and their interiors (Q1908642)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:32, 30 July 2024 by Openalex240730090724 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Control of systems to sets and their interiors
scientific article

    Statements

    Control of systems to sets and their interiors (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 March 1996
    0 references
    For a differential inclusion \(\dot x\in F(t, x)\) and for a target set \(S\subset \mathbb{R}^n\) the problems of local weak (by some trajectory \(x(t)\) of the inclusion) and strong (by all trajectories \(x(t)\)) attainability of \(S\) are considered. The authors give the sufficient conditions for such attainability in terms of proximal normals and proximal subgradients. The proofs are based upon the time discretization method. The authors show that for the problem under consideration, the known state continuity assumption on the right-hand side \(F(t, x)\) of the differential inclusion can be weakened to upper semicontinuity in \(x\). The problems of weak and strong penetration at a point \(x\) are also studied (the penetration property means that for a fixed point \(x\) on the boundary of \(S\) some trajectory \(x(t)\) (for weak penetration) or every trajectory \(x(t)\) (for strong penetration) with a condition \(x(0)= x\) lies in the interior of \(S\) for small \(t>0\)). For these problems the target set \(S\) is assumed to be epicontinuous near \(x\). Three examples are given to illustrate the role of the hypotheses.
    0 references
    differential inclusion
    0 references
    attainability
    0 references
    proximal normals
    0 references
    proximal subgradients
    0 references
    time discretization
    0 references
    penetration property
    0 references

    Identifiers