Smoothly equivalent real analytic proper \(G\)-manifolds are subanalytically equivalent (Q2563769)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 08:40, 30 July 2024 by Openalex240730090724 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Smoothly equivalent real analytic proper \(G\)-manifolds are subanalytically equivalent
scientific article

    Statements

    Smoothly equivalent real analytic proper \(G\)-manifolds are subanalytically equivalent (English)
    0 references
    10 June 1997
    0 references
    The following result is proved: Theorem A. Let \(G\) be a Lie group and let \(M\) and \(N\) be real analytic proper \(G\)-manifolds. Suppose that there exists a \(G\)-equivariant \(C^r\) diffeomorphism \(f:M \to N\), where \(1\leq r< \infty\). Then there exists a subanalytic \(G\)-equivariant \(C^r\) diffeomorphism \(h:M \to N\). Furthermore we can choose \(h\) to be \(G\)-homotopic to \(f\). We recall here that a map \(h:M \to N\) between real analytic manifolds is subanalytic if it is continuous and its graph is a subanalytic subset of \(M \times N\). Thus if \(h:M \to N\) is subanalytic and a topological homeomorphism then also \(h^{-1}: N\to M\) is subanalytic. The main part of the conclusion of Theorem A is the very fact that \(h: M \to N\) is a \(G\)-equivariant subanalytic isomorphism. However, for the actual proof of Theorem A it is crucial that one maintains the \(C^r\) diffeomorphism, \(1\leq r< \infty\), property throughout the various stages of the proof. The additional fact that one can choose \(h\) to be \(G\)-homotopic to the given map \(f\) is important for applications of Theorem A to equivariant simple-homotopy theory and equivariant Whitehead torsion, and these questions will be discussed in another paper. An immediate applications of Theorem A is its role in establishing the uniqueness part in the equivariant triangulation theorem for smooth proper \(G\)-manifolds. Let \(M\) be a smooth proper \(G\)-manifold. We first note that by [the author, Every proper smooth action of a Lie group is equivalent to a real analytic action: a contribution to Hilbert's fifth problem, Ann. Math. Stud. 138, 189-220 (1995)] there exists a real analytic structure \(\beta\) on \(M\), compatible with the given smooth structure on \(M\), such that the action of \(G\) on \(M_\beta\) is real analytic. Furthermore, by [the author, Subanalytic equivariant triangulation of real analytic proper \(G\)-manifolds for \(G\) a Lie group, Preprint, Dept. Math., Princeton Univ. 1992] we know that the real analytic proper \(G\)-manifold \(M_\beta\) can be given a subanalytic equivariant triangulation and any two subanalytic equivariant triangulations of \(M_\beta\) have a common subanalytic equivariant subdivision. Now by Theorem A, the real analytic \(G\)-manifold \(M_\beta\) is uniquely determined up to \(G\)-equivariant subanalytic isomorphism, by the given smooth proper \(G\)-manifold \(M\). Thus we obtain, by the above procedure, for every smooth proper \(G\)-manifold \(M\) a class of equivariant triangulations of \(M\) with the property that any two equivariant triangulations in this class have equivariant subdivisions that are isomorphic.
    0 references
    \(G\)-equivariant
    0 references
    \(G\)-homotopic
    0 references
    Lie group
    0 references
    diffeomorphism
    0 references
    real analytic manifolds
    0 references
    subanalytic
    0 references
    simple-homotopy theory
    0 references
    equivariant Whitehead torsion
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references