Numerical experiments with a nonlinear evolution equation which exhibits blow-up (Q1196761)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:07, 30 July 2024 by Openalex240730090724 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Numerical experiments with a nonlinear evolution equation which exhibits blow-up
scientific article

    Statements

    Numerical experiments with a nonlinear evolution equation which exhibits blow-up (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 January 1993
    0 references
    The paper treats computation for (1) \(\dot{\omega}=[H\omega]\omega\) (where \(H\) is the Hilbert transform), proposed as a simplified vorticity model by \textit{P. Constantin}, \textit{P. D. Lax} and \textit{A. Majda} [Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 38, 715-724 (1985; Zbl 0615.76029)]\ with an explicit solution giving blow-up at \(t\to T_ *=2\) for \(\omega(0)=\cos{\pi x}\). The present concern is the extent to which standard schemes would provide a good indication that blow-up occurs; the paper explores the results of applying a standard ordinary differential equation solver to spectral and to pseudospectral discretizations for the operator. The exploration shows, in particular, the disappointing resolution of the pseudospectral method, which can be continued through \(t=2\) with comparatively indication of the blow-up despite exponential-order theoretical accuracy for smooth solutions, (i.e., \(t<2\)). To quote the authors, ``It is thus obvious that one has to be very cautious in using standard schemes when such solutions are involved''.
    0 references
    numerical experiments
    0 references
    nonlinear evolution equation
    0 references
    vorticity model
    0 references
    blow-up
    0 references
    pseudospectral method
    0 references

    Identifiers