Efficient and binary consensus functions on transitively valued relations (Q1059534)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 09:08, 30 July 2024 by Openalex240730090724 (talk | contribs) (Set OpenAlex properties.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Efficient and binary consensus functions on transitively valued relations
scientific article

    Statements

    Efficient and binary consensus functions on transitively valued relations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Given a set S, the consensus problem on S is that of the construction, for any integer v, of a mapping \(\Phi:S^ v\to S\) such that, for any v- tuple \(\eta =(s_ 1,...,s_ v)\in S^ v\), \(s=\Phi (\eta)\) is a good representative of \(\eta\). In order to have that, \(\Phi\) must satisfy some conditions, some of them based on structural properties of S and the others derived from considerations related to a domain of application. Since Arrow's theorem, preference aggregation is a classical consensus problem; many recent works concern consensus of classifications. This paper presents Arrow-like results on sets of transitively valued relations, or fuzzy quasi-orders, on a finite set X. Here, \[ S=\{q\in L^{X\times X}| (\forall x,y,z\in X)q(xz)\leq \max (q(xy),q(yz))\}, \] where \(0\in L\subseteq {\mathbb{R}}^+\). This set, with the pointwise order, has a lattice structure. The main result of the paper gives the general form of consensus functions \(\Phi\) satisfying two axioms adapted from Arrow's ones: \(\Phi =\bigvee^{v}_{i=1}\phi_ i\circ q_ i\), for some reductive and isotone mappings \(\phi_ 1,...,\phi_ v:\) \(L\to L.\) Various consequences of this result are derived by adding further conditions on \(\Phi\), by setting \(L=\{0,1\}\), or by considering restrictions of the domain or the codomain of \(\Phi\). In preference aggregation, results of Arrow (1951), Mas-Collel and Sonnenschein (1972), Brown (1975) and Mirkin (1981) are found again. In classification, one obtains a new result on the consensus of ultrametrics (or dendrograms, an important class of hierarchical classification models), with a result on partitions due to Mirkin (1975), as a special case.
    0 references
    consensus problem
    0 references
    fuzzy quasi-orders
    0 references
    preference aggregation
    0 references
    hierarchical classification
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references