Sturmian numeration systems and decompositions to palindromes (Q1750221)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 20:48, 31 October 2024 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (‎Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q129910928, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1730404052578)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sturmian numeration systems and decompositions to palindromes
scientific article

    Statements

    Sturmian numeration systems and decompositions to palindromes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    18 May 2018
    0 references
    Given a finite word \(w\), one can always find a decomposition of \(w\) in factors that are all palindromes. Indeed, since the single letters are palindromes, a word of length \(n\) has a palindromic decomposition into at most \(n\) palindormes. If one takes an infinite word \(x\), a natural question is to determine if there exists an integer \(k\) such that every finite prefix of \(x\) can be decomposed in at most \(k\) palindromes. The author, together with \textit{S. Puzynina} and \textit{L. Zamboni}, conjectured in [Adv. Appl. Math. 50, No. 5, 737--748 (2013; Zbl 1285.68133)] that if an infinite word \(x\) is not periodic, then for every integer \(k\) there exists a prefix of \(x\) that cannot be decomposed in at most \(k\) palindromes. In the same paper, it was proved that this conjecture holds true for words that do not contain powers of arbitrary order as factors. This class includes Sturmian words whose slope has bounded partial quotients, and it is therefore natural to ask if the conjecture holds true for all Sturmian words. Using an extension of the classical Ostrowski numeration systems, the author answers this question in the affirmative.
    0 references
    0 references
    palindrome
    0 references
    palindromic length
    0 references
    Ostrowski numeration system
    0 references
    Sturmian word
    0 references

    Identifiers