A finiteness property of torsion points (Q1005864)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 12:27, 10 December 2024 by Import241208061232 (talk | contribs) (Normalize DOI.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A finiteness property of torsion points
scientific article

    Statements

    A finiteness property of torsion points (English)
    0 references
    16 March 2009
    0 references
    Let \(k\) be a number field with algebraic closure \(\bar{k}\) and ring of integers \(\mathcal{O}_k\). Let \(S\) be a finite set of places of \(k\) containing the archimedean places. Let \(\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{P}^1(\bar{k})\) be points, then we say that \(\beta\) is \(S\)-integral relative to \(\alpha\) if the Zariski-closures of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) in \(\mathbb{P}^1_{\mathcal{O}_k}\) do not meet outside \(S\). Similarly, if \(E/k\) is an elliptic curve with integral model \(\mathcal{E}/\mathrm{Spec}(\mathcal{O}_k)\), then a point \(\beta\in E(\bar{k})\) is \(S\)-integral relative to \(\alpha\in E(\bar{k})\) if the Zariski-closures of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) in \(\mathcal{E}\) do not meet outside fibres above \(S\). The goal of the present paper is to prove the following results: 1) Let \(\alpha\in\mathbb{P}^1(\bar{k})\smallsetminus\{0,\infty\}\) be not a root of unity. Then there are only finitely many roots of unity in \(\bar{k}\) that are \(S\)-integral relative to \(\alpha\). 2) Let \(\alpha\in E(\bar{k})\) be a non-torsion point. Then \(E(\bar{k})\) contains only finitely many torsion points which are \(S\)-integral relative to \(\alpha\). The main ingredients for the proofs of both results (which are structured similarly) are linear forms in logarithms (Baker's theorem for \(\mathbb{G}_a\), and David/Hirata-Kohno's theorem for elliptic curves, respectively), some properties of local height functions, and a strong form of equidistribution for torsion points at every place \(v\). The authors devote most of their energy to proving these strong equidistribution results, which are interesting in their own right. The authors also place their results in the context of more general conjectures on dynamical systems and abelian varieties, and also show why their results cannot be strengthened in a naive way.
    0 references
    elliptic curve
    0 references
    equidistribution
    0 references
    canonical height
    0 references
    torsion point
    0 references
    integral point
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references