On resampling methods for variance and bias estimation in linear models (Q1106593)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On resampling methods for variance and bias estimation in linear models |
scientific article |
Statements
On resampling methods for variance and bias estimation in linear models (English)
0 references
1988
0 references
Let g be a nonlinear function of the regression parameters \(\beta\) in a heteroscedastic linear model and \({\hat \beta}\) be the least squares estimator of \(\beta\). We consider the estimation of the variance and bias of g(\({\hat \beta}\)) [as an estimator of g(\(\beta)\)] by using three resampling methods: the weighted jackknife, the unweighted jackknife and the bootstrap. The asymptotic orders of the mean squared errors and biases of the resampling variance and bias estimators are given in terms of an imbalance measure of the model. Consistency of the resampling estimators is also studied. The results indicate that the weighted jackknife variance and bias estimators are asymptotically unbiased and consistent and their mean squared errors are of order \(o(n^{-2})\) if the imbalance measure converges to zero as the sample size \(n\to \infty.\) Furthermore, based on large sample properties, the weighted jackknife is better than the unweighted jackknife. The bootstrap method is shown to be asymptotically correct only under a homoscedastic error model. Bias reduction, a closely related problem, is also discussed.
0 references
heteroscedastic linear model
0 references
least squares estimator
0 references
resampling methods
0 references
weighted jackknife
0 references
bootstrap
0 references
resampling variance
0 references
imbalance measure
0 references
Consistency
0 references
bias estimators
0 references
asymptotically unbiased
0 references
mean squared errors
0 references
large sample properties
0 references
homoscedastic error model.
0 references
Bias reduction
0 references