Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields (Q2033000)

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 20:07, 16 December 2024 by Import241208061232 (talk | contribs) (Normalize DOI.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields
scientific article

    Statements

    Denseness results in the theory of algebraic fields (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 June 2021
    0 references
    By an \textit{algebraic field} of characteristic 0, the authors mean an algebraic extension of \(\mathbb{Q}\). The main result of this paper is Theorem 1.1, which says that every model of the common theory of algebraic fields of characteristic \(0\) is dense in all its real closures and in all its \(p\)-adic closures. The authors point out that a stronger result holds for algebraic fields: they are dense in their henselization with respect to any valuation (not just with respect to \(p\)-valuations), and that this stronger result no longer holds for arbitrary models of the common theory of algebraic fields. The authors obtain an important consequence of Theorem 1.1, which is Corollary 1.2 saying that if \(\mathbb{Q}\subseteq F\) is an algebraic field extension such that \(\mathbb{Q}\) is properly contained in the algebraic part of \(\mathbb{R}\) or in some \(\mathbb{Q}_p\), then the ring of power series over \(F\) is definable by an existential formula in the field of Laurent series over \(F\). The authors also show that the ``properly contained'' assumption above is necessary.
    0 references
    model theory
    0 references
    valuation
    0 references
    Henselian
    0 references
    real closure
    0 references
    \(p\)-adic closure
    0 references
    algebraic fields
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references