Commentary on ``On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold-standard by Schofield et al.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6627975
DOI10.1002/SIM.9086zbMATH Open1546.62182MaRDI QIDQ6627975FDOQ6627975
Publication date: 29 October 2024
Published in: Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Multiple-Bias Modelling for Analysis of Observational Data
- Random Effects Models in Latent Class Analysis for Evaluating Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests
- On model expansion, model contraction, identifiability and prior information: two illustrative scenarios involving mismeasured variables
- A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard
- When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
- Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance
- On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold standard
This page was built for publication: Commentary on ``On the robustness of latent class models for diagnostic testing with no gold-standard by Schofield et al.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6627975)