A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: It is shown that no theory that satisfies certain premises can exclude faster-than-light influences. The premises include neither the existence of hidden variables, nor counterfactual definiteness, nor any premise that effectively entails the general existence of outcomes of unperformed local measurements. All the premises are compatible with Copenhagen philosophy, and the principles and predictions of relativistic quantum field theory. The present proof is contrasted with an earlier one with the same objective.
Recommendations
- Bell's theorem without inequalities and without unspeakable information
- Bell's inequality without alternative settings
- Bell's theorems without inequalities for continuous variable systems and even-dimensional systems
- An analysis of Stapp's ``A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables
- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- The Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem
- Bell's theorem without inequalities: on the inception and scope of the GHZ theorem
- Bell's theorem: critique of proofs with and without inequalities
- Strengthening Bell's theorem: removing the hidden-variable assumption
- A note on Bell's theorem logical consistency
Cited in
(17)- A loophole of all `loophole-free' Bell-type theorems
- A Bayesian account of quantum histories
- The Wigner function as distribution function
- An analysis of Stapp's ``A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables
- Comments on Shimony's ``An analysis of Stapp's `A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables'
- Bell's theorem without inequalities and without unspeakable information
- Bell's inequality violation with non-negative Wigner functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4209290 (Why is no real title available?)
- Quantum locality?
- Non locality proofs in quantum mechanics analyzed by ordinary mathematical logic
- Strong constraints on models that explain the violation of Bell inequalities with hidden superluminal influences
- Refocusing Bohr's quantum postulate
- Quantum mechanics, can it be consistent with locality?
- How to (properly) strengthen Bell's theorem using counterfactuals
- On the consequences of retaining the general validity of locality in physical theory
- Bell locality and the nonlocal character of nature
- Relational EPR
This page was built for publication: A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3088659)
