A counterexample for some problem for de Groot dual iterations
Given a topological space \((X,\tau)\), a set \(A\subset X\) is called saturated if \(A=\bigcap {\mathcal A}\) for some family \({\mathcal A}\subset \tau\). The family of all compact saturated subsets of the space \(X\) is a closed base for a topology \(\tau^d\) which is called the de Groot dual of \(\tau\). It is proved in the paper that there exists a topological space \((X,\tau)\) such that \(\tau\) does not coincide with \(\mu^d\) for any topology \(\mu\) on the set \(X\) and, besides, \(\tau^d=\tau^{ddd} \neq \tau^{dd}\) while \(\tau^{dd} \subset \tau\) and \(\tau^{dd}\neq \tau\).
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3857958
- A counterexample to Dutkay-Jorgensen conjecture
- A counterexample to a conjecture due to Douglas, Reinbacher and Yau
- A counterexample to a conjecture of Drużkowski and Rusek
- A counterexample to Durfee's conjecture
- Publication:4860060
- A counterexample to Raikov's conjecture
- A counterexample to ``An extension of Gregus fixed point theorem
- A counterexample to Bueler’s conjecture
- On a counterexample in connection with the Picard-Lindelöf theorem
This page was built for publication: A counterexample for some problem for de Groot dual iterations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q837634)
