A dialetheic interpretation of classical logic

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_4MaRDI QIDQ5259655zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Massimiliano Carrara, Enrico Martino

Publication date 29 June 2015

Published in Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06080-4_4

zbMATH Keywords

classical logicCurry's paradoxdialetheism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6699700
• Trivial Dialetheism and the Logic of Paradox
• In defence of dialetheism: a reply to Beziau and Tkaczyk
• Can Priest's dialetheism avoid trivialism?
• Classical negation strikes back: why Priest's attack on classical negation can't succeed

Cites work

• Assertion, Denial and Non-classical Theories
• Can Priest's dialetheism avoid trivialism?
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• On dialetheic entailment
• The inconsistency of certain formal logics
• The logic of paradox

Cited in

(6)

• DLEAC: a dialetheic logic with exclusive assumptions and conclusions
• We don't know we don't know: asserting ignorance
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5521896 (Why is no real title available?)
• ON SOME INTERPRETATIONS OF CLASSICAL LOGIC
• An Unexpected Feature of Classical Propositional Logic in the Tractatus
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6787706 (Why is no real title available?)

This page was built for publication: A dialetheic interpretation of classical logic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5259655)