Classical negation strikes back: why Priest's attack on classical negation can't succeed

DOI10.1007/S11787-017-0178-ZMaRDI QIDQ1689563zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ederson Safra Melo, Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart

Publication date 12 January 2018

Published in Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-017-0178-z

zbMATH Keywords

Boolean negationcontradictionDe Morgan negationdialetheismliar paradox

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Paraconsistent logics (03B53)

Recommendations

• Priest on negation
• Remarks on naive set theory based on \(\mathbf{LP}\)
• Characterizing negation to face dialetheism
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3993533
• Contradictoriness, paraconsistent negation and non-intended models of classical logic

Cites work

• Absolute contradiction, dialetheism, and revenge
• Doubt truth to be a liar
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5997438 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5997439 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 43479 (Why is no real title available?)
• Liberating paraconsistency from contradiction
• Paraconsistent logics?
• Round squares are no contradictions (tutorial on negation contradiction and opposition)
• Things that are right with the traditional square of opposition
• Trivializing sentences and the promise of semantic completeness
• Truth, Trivialism, and Perceptual Illusions

Cited in

(4)

• Hegel's glutty negation
• Priest on negation
• A dialetheic interpretation of classical logic
• Boolean negation and all that

This page was built for publication: Classical negation strikes back: why Priest's attack on classical negation can't succeed

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1689563)